The Russian Federation is ranked second in the ranking of educational institutions. Why are ratings of educational organizations needed? How the rating of an educational institution is formed

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

2. General educational organizations of St. Petersburg in the All-Russian rankings

Literature

Today society is in dire need of reliable and transparent information about the quality of services in educational organizations: schools, kindergartens, institutions additional education, colleges, universities. Issues of assessing the quality of education are of concern to all participants educational process, because this is a guarantee of an optimally high standard of living for the population and a basis for increasing the competitiveness of the country as a whole. Procedure independent assessment quality of education is carried out in relation to the activities of educational organizations and the activities they implement educational programs in order to verify that the quality of services provided meets the needs of society. A popular consumer information tool educational services The results of an independent assessment of the quality of education are ratings.

Rating (English rating - assessment, order, classification) - a numerical or ordinal indicator that reflects the importance or significance of a certain object or phenomenon. The list of objects or phenomena with the highest rating is usually called “Top N” or “TOP N”,
where N is the number of objects in the list, usually a multiple of 10 Wikipedia https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rating.

Rating - ranking, prioritization, evaluation, order, classification. Rating means the determination of any evaluation parameter or group of parameters according to a specific evaluation algorithm,
according to a given ranking scale by surveying a large target group, or a limited group of experts. In essence, a rating is a measure of the popularity of something Dictionary http://www.marketch.ru/marketing_dictionary/marketing_terms_r/rating/.

IN AND. Slobodchikov understands rating as a subjective assessment of a phenomenon on a given scale. Using the rating, various rating scales are constructed, for example, assessment of various aspects labor activity, popularity of individuals, prestige of professions, etc. Slobodchikov V.I. Isaev E.I. Fundamentals of psychological anthropology. Psychology of Human Development, 2000, 7 p. .

The rating of educational organizations is a form of presenting the results of assessing the activities of educational organizations or systems, in which the rating participants are placed in a certain sequence depending on the ratings received for various indicators of their activities.

Firstly, families are guided by the rating when choosing schools and kindergartens. Such a rating should include only those educational organizations that are accessible to real consumers, primarily on a territorial basis. Yes, popular rating
"500 best schools Russia" is practically useless for a resident of, for example, the Far Eastern Federal District, especially if the schools in this district are not included in the TOP 500 best schools. In addition, the rating evaluation criteria are based on the average Unified State Examination score and the share of Olympiad winners
do not fully respond to the requests of the parent community regarding the quality of secondary general education.

Thirdly, for heads of educational organizations, the rating is a source of information for making management decisions; it is a powerful incentive for development and setting new guidelines.

When rating educational organizations, it is important to remember
about the conditions that ensure the effectiveness of the system of independent assessment of the quality of education: subjects of assessment (the public, the media, experts, education authorities, regional centers quality assessments, etc.) and data sources (“closed” and public databases). Not all information can be used when conducting an independent assessment of the quality of education and rating educational organizations. They must meet standard data requirements: relevance, reliability, completeness. It is also important that the data is presented in a single format, in common sources of information for all participants in the rating.

However, in the subjects Russian Federation The operating conditions of educational organizations are heterogeneous, thereby creating a need to create variable models for constructing ratings.

In the Novgorod region, ratings are a key element of the motivational strategy for managing results and have been formed since 1990. To construct ratings, specific significant indicators are used that are recognized by the educational community and the population. The results of the ratings provide an opportunity for education system employees to get an accurate idea of ​​how successfully they solve problems. educational policy, bonuses for high performance results. Ratings are used to determine the best specialists in the implementation of educational policies to maintain competition and spread successful experience into mass practice. Criteria and indicators have been developed to evaluate the performance of specialists from educational authorities.

For several years, all evaluation indicators reflected the criteria of “accessibility,” “quality,” and “efficiency” of education. The results included in the criterial base were divided into “general education”, “profile”, “creative” and “social-personal”. When determining the weight coefficient of each indicator, the significance of the result, the complexity of its achievement, dependence on work efficiency, and not on external factors. Along with well-known ones, assessment procedures developed in the Novgorod region were used: testing of 4th grade students, sociological quality monitoring educational activities. In addition, the conditions ensuring the accessibility of quality education were assessed: the availability of the required number of textbooks, qualified teaching staff, equipment, as well as conditions affecting the health of students.

Subsequently, indicators for assessing the quality of education were improved. At the moment, the assessment of indicator values ​​is carried out separately according to the level of efficiency (level of performance, level of efficiency of spending budget funds, the level of public assessment of the results of the activities of educational authorities and educational institutions) and by the dynamics of efficiency (dynamics are defined as the difference in the values ​​of the corresponding indicator in the reporting and base years).

Data analysis is carried out expert group consisting of representatives of educational authorities, public organizations and independent experts. In accordance with the assessment of the values ​​of performance indicators (taking into account the results of expert analysis), the rating of the municipal district (urban district) or educational institution by level of efficiency, rating by efficiency dynamics and final rating.

In the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, a cluster approach is used, which levels out the specific features of educational organizations operating in different conditions (territorial differentiation, differences in the contingent, etc.). Taking into account the characteristics, 8 clusters were identified: innovative educational institutions, large and small urban schools based on the number of students in graduating classes, rural schools, basic schools, boarding schools, primary schools, evening schools. The criteria were formed based on an analysis of consumer requests for the quality of educational services and are distributed in 9 areas: quality of education, content and technology of education, accessibility and quality of additional education, safety and comfort of the educational environment, equipment of the educational process, school operating hours, quality staffing, openness of the educational organization, educational opportunities for children with special needs. The criteria for assessing the quality of education contain invariant and variable parts to take into account the differences in the differentiation of the cluster approach. Thereby providing each cluster with its own set of criteria, indicators and indicators.

Next, based on normalized data and weighting coefficients, a composite index of each educational organization is calculated. Based on its results, a rating of educational organizations is formed for each cluster separately.

In the Krasnoyarsk Territory, the selection of criteria for assessing the quality of education was carried out based on the results of a population survey and on the basis of statistical data held by education authorities. Thus, ratings for schools are based on the following areas and criteria: quality of education (average results of the Unified State Examination, GIA-9, Regional tests in Russian language and mathematics, results of participation in the stages of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren); equipment of the educational process (availability of specialized premises, use of the Internet); safety and comfort (providing medical care, food, security); quality of personnel (supply of personnel, level of qualifications); teaching children with special needs.

Ratings for preschool educational organizations are based on the following areas: availability of educational services (except for paid ones); quality of staffing; quality of conditions (according to the criteria of organizing space and conditions for maintaining health).

IN Astrakhan region The rating is carried out in four areas, containing the following groups of indicators: indicators for assessing the quality of the conditions for the implementation of general education programs in the institution; indicators for assessing the results of mastering basic general education programs, characterizing minimum level achievements by students of the region of existing federal state educational standards and regional standards; indicators for assessing the achievement of educational qualifications based on the results of mastering basic general education programs as the main values ​​characterizing the quality of general education programs implemented in the region; assessment indicators public opinion on the quality of educational services in educational institutions. Comprehensive assessment quality of education is carried out on the basis of: the results of a survey of parents of students of educational organizations in the Astrakhan region; standardized procedures for monitoring the quality of general education; federal government data statistical observation of Education; data on licensing procedures and state accreditation of educational institutions; final certification of graduates of 9th and 11th grades.

Thus, we can conclude that approaches to the formation of ratings of educational organizations are different in each specific region of the Russian Federation due to the peculiarities of their functioning and territorial location.

The rating serves as the basis for identifying and analyzing problems that slow down the pace of implementation of educational policy, for setting priorities when setting new tasks and optimizing mechanisms for solving them. Ratings are formed competitive environment, which in turn accelerates the solution of priority tasks, identifies best practices for solving problems for the purpose of further dissemination, increases public awareness of the results of ongoing reforms, inspiring public confidence.

The results of an independent assessment of the quality of education and ratings can be used in forecasting and comparative analysis the effectiveness of various organizational models and educational systems, innovative design, in the development of management methods and public-private partnerships, intra- and intersectoral work, as well as combining the efforts of governing bodies, the parent community and the expert community in the development of education.

The ratings are carried out by the Moscow Center for Continuing Mathematical Education at information support MIA "Russia Today" and "Teacher's Newspaper" with the assistance of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

This rating represents an assessment of the contribution of a general education institution in providing students with the opportunity to receive a quality education and develop their abilities. It is built on the basis of instruments independent of general education organizations for measuring the level of training of schoolchildren - the main state exam and the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren.

Educational organizations that have at least one winner or prize-winner of the regional or final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren in the 2015-2016 academic year are considered for inclusion in the list. The ranking includes the 500 best educational organizations in Russia that demonstrated high educational results in 2015-2016 academic year.

Since 2014, the criterion “availability of competitive selection” has been taken into account. Starting from 2016, the participation of general education organizations in all-Russian testing works is taken into account.

The results of general education organizations are normalized in accordance with their quantitative occupancy, which makes it possible to significantly reduce the impact of the size of a general education organization on the chances of getting into the top lists. The presence of at least one prize-winner or winner of the final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren is a necessary condition inclusion in the rating list.

(1st place in TOP 500)

2. Lyceum “Physical and Technical School” of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “SPNIAU RAS” (24th place in the TOP 500)

4. GBOU "Academic Gymnasium No. 56"

5. GBOU "St. Petersburg Governor's Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 30"

6. GBOU Gymnasium No. 116 of Primorsky district

9. GBOU Gymnasium No. 205 of the Frunzensky district

10. GBOU Gymnasium No. 261, Kirov district

11. GBOU Gymnasium No. 271 of Krasnoselsky district

12. GBOU Gymnasium No. 406 of Pushkin district

13. GBOU Gymnasium No. 446, Kolpinsky district

14. GBOU Gymnasium No. 52 of Primorsky district

15. GBOU Gymnasium No. 526, Moskovsky district

16. GBOU Gymnasium No. 528 of Nevsky district

17. GBOU Gymnasium No. 61, Vyborg district

18. GBOU Gymnasium No. 610 “St. Petersburg Classical Gymnasium” Petrograd district

19. GBOU Gymnasium No. 642 “Earth and Universe” Vasileostrovsky district

20. GBOU Gymnasium No. 652, Vyborg district

21. State Budgetary Educational Institution Lyceum No. 369 of Krasnoselsky District

22. State Budgetary Educational Institution Lyceum No. 384 of the Kirov District

23. GBOU Lyceum No. 533 “Educational complex “Malaya Okhta” Krasnogvardeisky district

24. GBOU secondary school No. 222 with in-depth study German language"PETRISHULE" Central region

25. GBOU secondary school No. 29 with in-depth study of the French language and law of the Vasileostrovsky district

26. GBOU secondary school No. 318 with in-depth study Italian language Frunzensky district

27. GBOU secondary school No. 332 of Nevsky district

28. GBOU secondary school No. 43 with in-depth study foreign languages"Linguistic school" of Primorsky district

29. GBOU secondary school No. 45 with in-depth study of mathematics in Primorsky district

30. GBOU secondary school No. 455 with in-depth study in English Kolpinsky district

31. GBOU secondary school No. 471, Vyborg district

1. GBOU Second St. Petersburg Gymnasium;

2. State Budgetary Educational Institution Lyceum No. 64 of Primorsky District;

3. GBOU secondary school No. 4 with in-depth study of the French language named after Jacques-Yves Cousteau, Vasileostrovsky district;

4. GBOU Lyceum No. 214 of the Central District;

5. GBOU secondary school No. 605 with in-depth study of the German language in the Vyborg region.

In order to support educational institutions included in the TOP 500 “Best Schools in Russia”, the Education Committee organized a meeting of the heads of these institutions with the Governor of St. Petersburg
G.S. Poltavchenko, and also presented gratitude from the Education Committee.

Rating "The best schools, providing development talents students."

The ranking of the best schools for talent development takes into account only the results of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren: the absolute number of winners and prize-winners of the Olympiad, the number of subjects in which schoolchildren performed successfully. The methodology was developed taking into account the size of the school.

The Top 200 educational organizations that provide high opportunities for developing students’ abilities include:
from St. Petersburg:

3. GBOU "Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239"

4. GBOU "St. Petersburg Governor's Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 30"

5. GBOU Gymnasium No. 610 “St. Petersburg Classical Gymnasium” of Petrograd region

6. GBOU Gymnasium No. 642 “Earth and Universe” of Vasileostrovsky district

7. GBOU Gymnasium No. 155 of the Central District

8. GBOU Gymnasium No. 171 of the Central District

9. GBOU Lyceum No. 533 “Educational complex “Malaya Okhta” Krasnogvardeisky district

11. Academic gymnasium named after D.K. Faddeev St. Petersburg State University

In 2015 there were 12 such schools.

1. GBOU Central Educational Institution “St. Petersburg City Palace of Youth Creativity”. Anichkov Lyceum;

2. GBOU secondary school No. 4 with in-depth study of the French language named after. Jacques-Yves Cousteau, Vasileostrovsky district;

3. GBOU secondary school No. 605 with in-depth study of the German language, Vyborg region

Rating "The best schools, providing high level profile preparation."

When compiling the rating, the results of the final and regional stages of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren in a given specialized field were taken into account, as well as the results of the Compulsory State Examination (OGE) in specialized subjects. For inclusion in the list, educational organizations that had at least one winner or prize-winner of the regional or final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren of the 2015-2016 academic year in at least one of the subjects included in the subject area (profile) were considered. Only the 25 best students in a general education organization are taken into account. The ranking included the first 100 educational institutions.

TOP educational institutions of chemical and biological profile:

3. GBOU Gymnasium No. 261, Kirov district

4. State Budgetary Educational Institution Lyceum No. 554 of Primorsky District

5. GBOU secondary school No. 225 of the Admiralteysky district

6. Academic gymnasium named after D.K. Faddeev St. Petersburg State University

TOP educational organizations of biological and geographical profile

1. GBOU "Academic Gymnasium No. 56"

2. GBOU Gymnasium No. 116 of Primorsky district

3. State Budgetary Educational Institution Lyceum No. 554 of Primorsky District

4. GBOU secondary school No. 225 of the Admiralteysky district

5. Academic gymnasium named after D.K. Faddeev St. Petersburg State University

In 2015 there were 1 such schools.

TOP educational organizations of industrial and technological profile:

1. Lyceum “Physical and Technical School” of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “SPNIAU RAS” (2nd place)

2. GBOU "Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239"
(3rd place)

3. GBOU secondary school No. 455 with in-depth study of English, Kolpinsky district

4. GBOU secondary school No. 551, Kirov district

TOP general education organizations with a mathematical profile:

1. Lyceum "Physical and Technical School" FSBEI HE "SPNIAU RAS"

2. GBOU “Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239”
(1st place)

In 2015 there were 4 such schools.

TOP educational organizations of defense and sports profile:

1. GBOU Gymnasium No. 528 of Nevsky district

2. GBOU Lyceum No. 419 of Petrodvortsovo district

3. GBOU secondary school No. 332 of Nevsky district

4. GBOU secondary school No. 583 of Primorsky district

5. GBOU secondary school No. 135 with in-depth study of the English language, Vyborg district

6. GBOU secondary school No. 422, Kronstadt district

In 2015 there were 3 such schools.

TOP educational organizations with a social and humanitarian profile:

1. GBOU "Academic Gymnasium No. 56"

2. GBOU Gymnasium No. 610 “St. Petersburg Classical Gymnasium” of Petrograd region

3. GBOU Gymnasium No. 642 “Earth and Universe” of Vasileostrovsky district

In 2015 there were 3 such schools.

TOP educational organizations of socio-economic profile:

1. GBOU "Academic Gymnasium No. 56"

2. GBOU "Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239"

3. Academic gymnasium named after D.K. Faddeev St. Petersburg State University

In 2015 there were 1 such schools.

TOP general education organizations with a physics and mathematics profile:

1. GBOU "Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239"
(1st place)

2. Lyceum “Physical and Technical School” of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “SPNIAU RAS” (4th place)

3. GBOU "St. Petersburg Governor's Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 30"

4. GBOU Lyceum No. 533 “Educational complex “Malaya Okhta” Krasnogvardeisky district

In 2015 there were 5 such schools.

TOP educational organizations of physical and chemical profile:

1. GBOU "Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239"
(2nd place)

In 2015 there were 2 such schools.

TOP educational organizations with a philological profile:

1. GBOU Gymnasium No. 171 of the Central District (6th place)

2. GBOU "Academic Gymnasium No. 56"

3. GBOU Gymnasium No. 61, Vyborg district

4. GBOU Gymnasium No. 610 “St. Petersburg Classical Gymnasium” of Petrograd region

5. GBOU Gymnasium No. 642 “Earth and Universe” of Vasileostrovsky district

6. GBOU Gymnasium No. 652, Vyborg district

7. GBOU Gymnasium No. 155 of the Central District

8. GBOU Gymnasium No. 406 of Pushkin district

9. GBOU Secondary School No. 43 with in-depth study of foreign languages ​​“Linguistic School” of Primorsky District

10. GBOU secondary school No. 222 with in-depth study of the German language “PETRISHULE” of the Central region

11. GBOU secondary school No. 29 with in-depth study of the French language and law of the Vasileostrovsky district

In 2015 there were 6 such schools.

Table 1

№ p/p	Educationalinstitution	AvailabilityOUVranking
		The bestschoolsRussia-2016	The bestschools,providingdevelopmenttalentsstudents	The bestschools,providinghighlevelprofilepreparation(from10 profiles)
	GBOU "Presidential Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 239" Lyceum "Physics and Technology School"	1st place in TOP-500
	FSBEI HE "SPNIAU RAS"	24th place
	Academic gymnasium named after D.K. Faddeev St. Petersburg State University
	GBOU "Academic Gymnasium No. 56"
	GBOU "St. Petersburg Governor's Physics and Mathematics Lyceum No. 30"
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 116 of Primorsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 155 of the Central District
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 171 of the Central District
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 205 of Frunzensky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 261, Kirov district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 271 of Krasnoselsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 406 of Pushkin district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 446 of Kolpinsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 52 of Primorsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 526, Moskovsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 528 of Nevsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 61 of Vyborg district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 610 “St. Petersburg Classical Gymnasium” of Petrograd region
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 642 “Earth and Universe” Vasileostrovsky district
	GBOU Gymnasium No. 652 of Vyborg district
	GBOU Lyceum No. 369 of Krasnoselsky district
	GBOU Lyceum No. 384 of the Kirov region
	GBOU Lyceum No. 533 "Educational complex "Malaya Okhta" Krasnogvardeisky district
	GBOU secondary school No. 222 with in-depth study of the German language “PETRISHULE” of the Central region
	GBOU secondary school No. 29 with in-depth study of the French language and law of the Vasileostrovsky district
	GBOU secondary school No. 318 with in-depth study of the Italian language in the Frunzensky district
	GBOU secondary school No. 332 Nevsky district
	GBOU Secondary School No. 43 with in-depth study of foreign languages ​​"Linguistic School" of Primorsky District
	GBOU secondary school No. 45 with in-depth study of mathematics in Primorsky district
	GBOU secondary school No. 455 with in-depth study of English in Kolpino district
	GBOU Secondary School No. 471, Vyborg District
	GBOU Lyceum No. 554 of Primorsky district
	GBOU secondary school No. 225 of the Admiralteysky district
	GBOU Secondary School No. 551, Kirov District
	GBOU Lyceum No. 419 of Petrodvortsovo district
	GBOU secondary school No. 583 of Primorsky district
	GBOU secondary school No. 135 with in-depth study of English in the Vyborg region
	GBOU secondary school No. 422, Kronstadt district

table 2

On the participation of educational institutions of St. Petersburg in the ratings of MIA "Russia Today" in 2016 by district

DistrictsSt. Petersburg
	The bestschoolsRussia-2016	The bestschools,providingdevelopmenttalentsstudents	The bestschools,providinghighlevelprofilepreparation(from10 profiles)
Admiralteysky
Vasileostrovsky
Vyborg
Kalininsky
Kirovsky
Kolpinsky
Krasnogvardeisky
Krasnoselsky
Kronstadt
Resort
Moscow
Petrogradsky
Petrodvortsovy
Seaside			116, 43, 554(2), 583
Pushkinsky
Frunzensky
Central	155, 171, PETRISHULE,	155, 171, PETRISHULE	155, 171, PETRISHULE,
Schoolsurbansubmission			239 (6), 56(5), 30(2)
Schoolsfederalsubmission	SPNIAU, St. Petersburg State University	SPNIAU, St. Petersburg State University	SPNIAU (3), SPbSU (3)
TOTAL:

Thus, we can conclude that St. Petersburg schools provide quality education, entering the rankings of the best schools in Russia and maintaining their positions in them.

St. Petersburg has developed and applies its own regional sectoral system of ratings of educational organizations.

Ratings of educational organizations in St. Petersburg that implement educational programs of secondary general education are based on the criteria of the St. Petersburg regional system for assessing the quality of education, approved by the order of the Education Committee dated January 20, 2014 No. 37-r “On approval of the model of the regional system for assessing the quality of education (hereinafter - St. Petersburg RSOKO), Regulations on St. Petersburg RSOKO and criteria for St. Petersburg RSOKO” and are formed to increase the openness of the education system of St. Petersburg.

The ratings are based on an analysis of objective data contained in information systems Academy of St. Petersburg: AISU "Paragraph-Movement", a regional information system for ensuring the state final certification of students who have mastered the basic educational programs of basic general and secondary general education, a database of olympiads.

Based on the results of the 2014-2015 academic year, final ratings were built in 4 main areas:

results of mass education;

high educational results and achievements;

terms of reference educational activities;

staffing.

The first 100 places in each final ranking are subject to publication (the number 100 is conditional; if the points are equal, it can be increased or decreased so that all educational organizations with the same number of points are included in the published part of the rating). If an organization received high scores in several areas at once, it was included in several ratings simultaneously.

The range of indicator values ​​calculated for educational organizations is divided into ten equal parts;

Organizations whose indicator values ​​fall into the first part are assigned a rating score of 10, and those in the second group - 9;

Organizations in which the indicator is 0 or the data is not available in the information systems of St. Petersburg are assigned a rating score of 0.

Interim ratings are built on the basis of primary ratings. The position in the intermediate ranking is determined by summing up the points of the primary rankings. Intermediate ratings are used for thematic grouping of primary ratings and analysis of results.

The position of an educational organization in the final ranking is determined by summing up the rating points of intermediate rankings. General structure ratings are presented in Table 1.

The rating of educational organizations based on the results of mass education is calculated according to the following indicators: Unified State Examination results in the Russian language, mathematics, elective subjects, Unified State Examination results in the Russian language, mathematics, uniformity of Unified State Examination results, uniformity of Unified State Examination results, absence of unsatisfactory learning results. The results of the Unified State Examination and the Unified State Examination, used to calculate the rating, are calculated from the median of the primary scores in the subject of graduates of each educational institution.

The location of educational organizations within each rating group (OOs with the same amount of rating points) is in ascending order of their numbers.

The rating of educational organizations for high educational results and achievements of students is calculated according to the following indicators: results of participation in regional Olympiads in St. Petersburg, results of participation in the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren: regional and final stages, high results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language, mathematics, elective subjects, OGE in Russian language, mathematics.

The rating of educational organizations in terms of the quality of conditions for conducting educational activities is calculated according to the following indicators: provision of students with computers, provision of teachers with computers, provision of the school with multimedia projectors, interactive whiteboards and consoles, provision of the school with areas for various purposes, provision of the school with sports and social infrastructure facilities,

The rating of educational organizations in terms of staffing is calculated according to the following indicators: supply of teaching staff, provision of teachers with methodological support, provision of students with support services, qualification category of teachers, teacher awards, advanced training for teachers.

Table 3

		Unified State Examination results in Russian language
		Unified State Examination results in mathematics
		Unified State Examination results in mathematics
		OGE results in Russian language
		OGE results in mathematics
		uniformity of Unified State Examination results in the Russian language, mathematics, and elective subjects
		homogeneity of OGE results in Russian language and mathematics
		absence of unsatisfactory learning results - repeated training, unsatisfactory passing of the State Examination Test
		results of participation in regional competitions
		results of participation in the regional stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren
		results of participation in the final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren
		high results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language
		high USE results in mathematics
		high USE results in elective subjects
		high results of the OGE in the Russian language
		high results of the OGE in mathematics
		provision of students with computers
		provision of teachers with computers
		provision of educational institutions with multimedia projectors
		provision of educational institutions with interactive whiteboards and consoles
		provision of areas for various purposes
		provision of sports infrastructure facilities
		provision of social infrastructure
		provision of educational institutions with teaching staff
		provision of teachers with methodological support
		provision of student support services
		training

· will provide parents with reliable information on key issues of the quality of educational services provided by educational organizations, and will help them with choosing or evaluating the educational organization in which their children are already studying;

· will provide heads of educational organizations the opportunity to compare the quality of education of your educational organization with others, to identify strengths and weaknesses in activities, analysis of the reasons for the lag and choice priority areas for ensuring High Quality education;

· will provide managers and specialists of educational authorities correct comparative assessment activities of subordinate organizations in the field of ensuring the quality of education for analysis and making effective management decisions.

Literature

1. Aralova, M. A. Directory of a psychologist at a preschool educational institution: monograph. / M.A. Aralova. M.: Sfera, 2015. 272 ​​p.

2. Vyskub, V. G. Russian public-state system of certification of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel highly qualified/ V.G. Vyskub. M.: Logos, 2014. 256 p.

3. Gedrimovich, G. V. Research, educational and information activities Higher school on the example of socio-economic education / G.V. Gedrimovich, M.V. Ezhov, S.M. Klimov. M.: IVESEP, 2015. 384 p.

4. Danilina, T. A. In the world of children's emotions. A manual for practical preschool employees/ T.A. Danilina, V.Ya. Zedgenidze, N.M. Stepina. M.: Iris-press, 2014. 160 p.

5. Derkach, V. I. Optimization of management of personnel activities in educational systems: monograph. / IN AND. Derkach. M.: Itar-Tass, 2015. 152 p.

6. Egorov, V. B. Modern science and tradition of the Church in school education. Search for connections: monograph. / V.B. Egorov. M.: Endemic, 2014. 240 p.

7. Kozak, N. N. Integrated safety in educational institutions. Tutorial/ N.N. Kozak. M.: Phoenix, 2016. 352 p.

8. Federal concept target program development of education for 2006-2010. M.: Sfera, 2015. 530 p.

9. Kotova, E.V. State regulatory authorities in educational institutions / E.V. Kotova. M.: Karo, 2014. 272 ​​p.

10. Kryuchkova, I. V. Innovative practice of achieving educational results for schoolchildren in the context of the implementation of new Federal State Educational Standards. Textbook / I.V. Kryuchkova. M.: Author's Club, 2015. 383 p.

11. Kulnevich, S. V. Management modern school. Issue 3. Municipal methodological services / S.V. Kulnevich, V.I. Goncharova, E.A. Flashing. M.: Uchitel, 2016. 224 p.

12. Lobanov, A. P. Modular approach in the system of higher education. Fundamentals of structuralization and metacognition / A.P. Lobanov, N.V. Drozdova. M.: RIVSH, 2016. 733 p.

13. Management in the practice of preschool educational institutions / L.A. Penkova et al. M.: Sfera, 2014. 838 p.

15. Modernization of Russian education. Challenges of the new decade. M.: Publishing house "Delo" RANEPA, 2015. 104 p.

16. Modernization of Russian education: challenges of the new decade. M.: Publishing house "Delo" RANEPA, 2016. 104 p.

17. To the young teacher. M.: Education, 2015. 416 p.

18. Monitoring in a modern kindergarten. Toolkit. M.: Sfera, 2014. 559 p.

19. Morgunov, G.M. Sociosynergetics and education / G.M. Morgunov. M.: MPEI, 2014. 152 p.

20. Educational systems modern Russia. Directory. M.: RSUH, 2014. 496 p.

21. Health-improving work in preschool educational institutions according to the “Island of Health” program. M.: Uchitel, 2014. 152 p.

22. Organization of kindergartens during the revolution. M.: Sfera, 2015. 128 p.

23. Pastorova, A. Yu. Inclusive education: research and practice in St. Petersburg / A. Yu. Pastorova. M.: St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 2015. 666 p.

24. Rastimeshin, Dmitry Municipal Autonomous non-profit organizations in education / Dmitry Rastimeshin. M.: Agency for Educational Cooperation, 2014. 875 p.

25. Rubin, Yu. B. Higher education in Russia. Quality and competitiveness / Yu.B. Ruby. M.: Moscow Financial-Industrial Academy, 2014. 448 p.

26. Sobkin, V. S. Modern Russian teacher. Sketch for a sociological portrait: monograph. / V.S. Sobkin, D.V. Adamchuk. M.: Author's Club, 2015. 857 p.

27. Fiapshev, B. Kh. Educational standards, autonomy of higher education, academic freedom / B. Kh. Fiapshev. M.: Public Education, 2014. 216 p.

28. Shlykova, O.V. Internationalization of University Education in the Context of Social and Information Technologies / O.V. Shlykova. Moscow: SINTEG, 2015. 994 p.

29. Shlykova, O. V. Russian Resources of the Educational Environment. Internet / O.V. Shlykova. Moscow: Nauka, 2014. 481 p.

30. Shteringarts, E. M. Children's science club. Organization of developmental training for schoolchildren in additional education / E.M. Steringharz. M.: Author's Club, 2015. 495 p.

Posted on Allbest.ru

...

Similar documents

Analysis of the study of address groups of the website of an educational organization. Assessment of the results of interaction between parents and schools according to all-Russian public opinion polls and on the basis of educational organizations in the Kirov district of St. Petersburg.

thesis, added 01/05/2016


Types, structures and technologies educational resources. Ways to motivate and stimulate independent intra-semester work of students. Use of information systems distance learning and a point-rating system for assessing knowledge.

thesis, added 09/30/2017


Analysis of the system of additional education for children and adolescents as part of their work towards the development of the creative personality of pupils. Features of additional education institutions as educational organizations, their role in the development of personality.

thesis, added 10/03/2013


Artistic association "World of Art": origins, creation of the association and magazine, participants. Algorithm for working with visual clarity. Features of using the visual teaching method in the lessons of the school course on history and culture of St. Petersburg.

thesis, added 06/11/2017


The theory of ensuring the competitiveness of institutions of higher professional education. Formation and criterial assessment of the innovative potential of educational organizations in the field professional retraining and staff development.

thesis, added 01/24/2018


Characteristics and types of children's public organizations. The role of children's public organizations in the education of students. Analysis of the activities of children's public organizations and their role in the education and formation of the personality of children in the Omsk region.

course work, added 10/26/2012


Meaning educational work in the ideological directions of state activity. The problem of organizing educational work in primary classes secondary schools them. Kyzylteyit. Marketing in the activities of directors in educational institutions.

thesis, added 04/12/2014


Introduction to theoretical background diagnostic test and assessment of students' educational results in the educational process. Consideration and characterization of the features of diagnostic tools for the educational results of younger schoolchildren.

thesis, added 09/24/2017


Areas of activity of the Center for Research in medical education Michael Gordon (USA). Simulation technologies in healthcare as an object of training for representatives of medical organizations. Recommendations for improving educational programs.

presentation, added 04/04/2011


Prerequisites for the appearance of " effective contract"in the practice of Russian education. Processing of personal data. Effects in work teaching staff professional educational organizations of the Moscow region during the transition to an effective contract.

Ratings and lists of the best educational organizations of the Russian Federation

Lists of the best educational organizations in 2017

Moscow Center for Continuing Mathematical Education with information support from the Social Navigator of MIA Rossiya Segodnya and Teacher's Newspaper with the assistance of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation 500 best schools that demonstrated high educational results in the 2016-2017 academic year.

Lists of the best educational organizations in 2016

The Moscow Center for Continuing Mathematical Education, with information support from the Social Navigator of MIA Rossiya Segodnya and Teacher's Gazette, with the assistance of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, has prepared a list of the 500 best educational organizations that demonstrated high educational results in the 2015-2016 academic year.

Lists of the best educational organizations in 2015

"The best schools in Russia" is an annual list of the best educational organizations in Russia, which has been compiled since 2013. Until 2014 inclusive, the criterion “Results of the Unified State Exam (USE)” was used to form ratings. Since 2015, the assessment of the contribution of a general education organization to quality education is determined based on the results of the OGE. The indicator for the results of the Olympiads remained the same.

N.B. ! The Moscow Center for Continuing Mathematical Education conducts research and prepares lists of the best schools in Russia with the information support of the “Social Navigator” project of the Rossiya Segodnya MIA and Teacher’s Newspaper with the assistance of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

"Social Navigator" MIA "Russia Today", the Federal Institute for Educational Development and the Institute for the Study of Childhood, Family and Education of the Russian Academy of Education, with the participation of regional educational authorities of the Russian Federation, prepared the "Rating of municipal kindergartens in Russia - 2015".

The rating included 7,182 organizations providing preschool education from 24 regions of the Russian Federation, including the Amur region, Astrakhan region, Belgorod region, Bryansk region, Volgograd region, Jewish Autonomous Region, Kirov region, Krasnodar region, Krasnoyarsk region, Novosibirsk region, Republic of Bashkortostan, Republic of Mari El, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, Republic of Tatarstan, Ryazan Region, Samara Region, Saratov Region, Stavropol Territory, Tambov Region, Tver Region, Ulyanovsk Region, Khabarovsk Territory, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Ugra, Chuvash Republic.

The rating was formed on the basis of a methodology developed by the Institute for the Study of Childhood, Family and Education of the Russian Academy of Education. The methodology was approved by the expert council for education of the Social Navigator project of the MIA Rossiya Segodnya.

Kindergartens were assessed in terms of the conditions created for the child, teaching staff and additional services.

Lists of the best educational organizations – 2014
The Moscow Center for Continuing Mathematical Education, with the information support of MIA Rossiya Segodnya and Teacher's Newspaper, with the assistance of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, has prepared a list of the 500 best educational organizations that demonstrated high educational results in the 2013-2014 academic year. Look at the ratings!

The leader of this year's ranking was compensatory kindergarten No. 77 "Erudite" in the city of Nizhnevartovsk, Tyumen region. On the second line of the top is kindergarten No. 307 in Volgograd. And closing the top three is kindergarten No. 72 “Dolfinenok” in the city of Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Territory, which took part in the rating for the first time.

The list includes 3969 preschool educational organizations in St. Petersburg, Altai Territory, Volgograd Region, Jewish Autonomous Region, Kaluga Region, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Kursk region, Novgorod region, Novosibirsk region, Samara region, Saratov region, Tambov region, Komi Republic, Republic of Mordovia, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania, Republic of Tatarstan, Ryazan region, Udmurt Republic, Ulyanovsk region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug.

Read also kindergartens and.

The rating was formed on the basis of the Methodology developed by the Institute of Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Childhood of the Russian Academy of Education and agreed upon by the Education Expert Council of RIA Novosti. Kindergartens were assessed in terms of the conditions created for the child, teaching staff and additional kindergarten services.

The rating of kindergartens, methodology and interpretation are also published in the attached files below - see the end of the page!

The Social Research Agency “Social Navigator”, with the support of the Interregional Association for Monitoring and Statistics of Education (IAMSO), with the participation of regional education authorities in 39 regions of the Russian Federation, “Teachers' Newspaper” and the magazine “School Director”, prepared the Rating of Advanced Level Schools of the Russian Federation - 2013.

The study was conducted in 41 regions of the Russian Federation and is a continuation of the project, the results of which were presented in April 2013 on the RIA Novosti platform.

The rating included 1,428 gymnasiums, lyceums, schools with in-depth study of individual subjects, educational centers located on the territory of the following constituent entities of the Russian Federation: Altai Territory, Arkhangelsk Region, Belgorod Region, Vladimir Region, Volgograd Region, Vologda Region, Jewish Autonomous Region, Kabardino- Balkar Republic, Kaliningrad region, Kaluga region, Kirov region, Krasnoyarsk region, Kursk region, Magadan region, Moscow region, Moscow, Novgorod region, Novosibirsk region, Oryol region, Perm region, Pskov region, Republic of Buryatia, Republic of Kalmykia, Komi Republic, Republic of Mordovia, Republic of Tatarstan, Republic of Tyva, Ryazan region, St. Petersburg, Samara region, Saratov region, Sakhalin region, Tambov region, Tomsk region, Tula region, Ulyanovsk region, Khabarovsk Territory, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Ugra, Chelyabinsk Region, Chuvash Republic, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug.

The source of information for calculating the rating was data provided by regional educational authorities and educational organizations in Moscow and the Magadan region, which independently decided to participate in the study.

The rating is based on the methodology , developed by the Interregional Association for Monitoring and Statistics of Education (IAMSO) and agreed with the Expert Council on Education RIA Novosti .

The rating is in the attached file below. Rating of municipal kindergartens in Russia 2013
Prepared by RIA Novosti and the Institute of Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Childhood of the Russian Academy of Education.In total, 3,536 kindergartens, representing 16 regions of the Russian Federation, took part in the rating study. During the research process, an initial array of data was collected, representing information on the characteristics of kindergartens, which can be differentiated into three categories: “Conditions created for the child in kindergarten”, “Teachers working with children in kindergarten” and “Additional services in kindergarten." Based on these categories, a final summary rating was compiled, illustrating the distribution of kindergartens from kindergarten, which received the lowest rating (21.43%), to the leading preschool educational organization (54.95%).

The rating is in the attached file below. List of 500 best schools in Russia 2013
Prepared by the Moscow Center for Continuing Mathematical Education with the information support of the RIA Novosti Group and Teacher's Newspaper with the assistance of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. When forming the List, objective (independent) parameters from general education organizations were taken into account for measuring the level of training of graduates - the results of the Unified State Exam (USE), the regional and final stages of the All-Russian Olympiad for Schoolchildren.

Attached files:

• Top educational institutions in physical and chemical fields 2017
• Interpretation of the results of the rating of preschool educational institutions in 2014
• Top educational organizations by mathematical profile 2017
• Top 200 rural educational organizations. 2016
• Top 200 educational organizations that provide high opportunities for developing students' abilities. 2016

Block 1. Indicators of the effectiveness of an educational organization in providing quality mass education:

• for each student who scores at least 220 points in any three subjects on the Unified State Examination, is awarded 1 point;
• for each student who scored from 190 to 219 points in any three subjects on the Unified State Examination, is awarded 0.5 points;
• for each student who scores from 160 to 189 points in any three subjects on the Unified State Examination, is awarded 0.25 points;
• for each student who scored at least 12 points in total in three OGE subjects ( according to the FIPI recommended 5-point scale) is charged 0.25 points;
• for each subject for each student who has overcome the established minimum threshold in citywide compulsory subject diagnostics based on learning results in grades 4 and 7 - 0.02 points;
• for each student who has overcome the established minimum threshold in citywide compulsory meta-subject diagnostics based on learning results in grades 4 and 7 - 0.02 points;

If there are students removed from the Unified State Exam, the score scored by the educational organization based on the Unified State Exam results will be multiplied by a coefficient. This coefficient is calculated using the following formula:

Where = 1- (10*Number of remote students/Number of graduates)

Block 2. Indicators of the effectiveness of an educational organization in creating conditions for developing the talents of the maximum number of students.

2.1. Results of participation in the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren (regional and final stages) and the Moscow Olympiad for schoolchildren.

Points are awarded according to the following rule:

• winner of the final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren –
  10 points,
• winner of the final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren - 5 points,
• winner of the Moscow Olympiad for schoolchildren or the regional stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren – 3 points,
• winner of the Moscow Olympiad for schoolchildren or the regional stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren – 1 point,

2.2. Subject coverage at the municipal stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren. The results of participation in the municipal stage of VSOS are assessed:

• for every item, according to which the educational organization has winner or prize-winner of the municipal stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren in classes basic school is charged 0.2 points.

Block 3. Performance indicators for preschool groups.

• for each pupil transferred from a preschool group to the 1st grade of the same educational organization, 0.1 points.

Block 4. Indicators of the effectiveness of an educational organization in crime prevention

• for each student in grades 7-11 who has not committed an offense during the school year - 0.005 points
• for each student in grades 7-11 who is registered with the internal affairs bodies for preventive purposes and who has not committed an offense during the school year - 0.5 points
• for each student of grades 7-11 who is on an in-school preventive register in an educational organization (in agreement with the Governing Council) who has not committed an offense during the school year - 0.02 points

Each student is counted only once.

Block 5. Indicators of the effectiveness of an educational organization in working with students who have special educational needs.

Points awarded for students with disabilities (for the Unified State Exam, Unified State Exam, Olympiads, diagnostics, preschoolers) are multiplied by a factor of 3 (for those with a funding factor of 2), and by a factor of 5 (for those with a funding factor of 3).

Taking into account the fact that upon admission, students with disabilities must present one Unified State Examination, then for this category instead of:

• 1 point for a set of at least 220 points in total for three Unified State Examinations, 1 point for a set of at least 220 points is applied 73 points By alone from the Unified State Exam;
• 0.5 points per set from 190 to 219 points in total for three Unified State Examinations, 0.5 points per set is applied from 63 to 72 points one from the Unified State Exam;
• 0.25 points per set from 160 to 189 points in total for three Unified State Examinations, 0.25 points per set is applied from 53 to 62 points one from the Unified State Exam;
• 0.25 points for gaining at least 12 points in total in three OGE subjects, applies 4 points in one of the OGE subjects.

The rating points of an educational organization are multiplied by coefficients, depending on the number of children with disabilities. A detailed account is taken of the work of the educational organization with students who have special educational needs at different levels of education (preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general, secondary vocational). The total points of the educational organization scored for the results achieved at the corresponding level of education are multiplied by the coefficients for work with the corresponding groups of children with disabilities:

(Score for preschoolers)* To preschool

(Grade 4 diagnostic score)* To the beginning

(OGE score + Olympiad score + 7th grade diagnostics score) * To the main

(Unified State Exam Score*Kud+Olympiad Score)* K st.

(Development score professional excellence)* To spo

Coefficients Kst, Kbasic, Kbeg, Kpreshk, Kspo - are calculated using a formula depending on the number of disabled people mastering the relevant educational programs, the coefficients are calculated using the formula:

K i =1+0.00 2 *∑(financing ratio for children with disabilities).

Block 6. Indicators of the performance of an educational organization in using the socio-cultural resources of the city in teaching.

The results of students’ participation in the city Olympiads “Museums” are taken into account. Parks. Estates" and "The connection between generations will not be interrupted." The rating points of educational organizations are multiplied by a coefficient calculated depending on the level of performance (in total for both Olympiads):

• high level (presence of at least four diplomas, of which at least two winners) – coefficient 1,02 ;
• good level (at least three diplomas, at least one winner) – coefficient 1,01 ;
• work has just begun (presence of at least one prize-winner or winner diploma) – coefficient 1,005 ;
• results not shown or missing – coefficient 1,00 .

Block 7. Development professional skills and professional excellence.

The results of participation are taken into account:

• in the All-Russian Olympiad of professional skills of students in secondary vocational education;
• in competitions for professional movement skills WorldSkills Russia,
• in competitions in professional skills of the JuniorSkills Russia movement;

Each student in each nomination is counted once in accordance with maximum result. One student is counted no more than two various nominations:

• 10 points,
• 5 points,
• winner of the regional stage - 3 points,
• winner of the regional stage - 1 point.

The results of participation in the championship of professional skills for people with disabilities are taken into account Abilympix

• winner of the All-Russian stage – 10 points,
• All-Russian stage winner – 5 points,
• winner urban stage - 3 points,
• winner urban stage - 1 point.

The test results are also taken into account GIA according to WorldSkills Russia standards:

• Graduates’ GIA scores according to WorldSkills Russia standards are equal to similar Unified State Exam scores, determined by the corresponding percentiles on standardized scales.

Block 8. Development of mass amateur sports.

The results of participation of educational organizations in team competitions in amateur sports are taken into account:

• Presidential competitions;
• Presidential Sports Games;
• Moscow Basketball Championship “Victory Ball”;
• Open All-Russian chess competition "White Lady".

Points are awarded in accordance with the following rules (for each educational organization one best result for each competition - among all classes and all levels):

• team of an educational organization - winner of the All-Russian level - 10 points;
• team of an educational organization - winner of the All-Russian level - 5 points;
• team of an educational organization - winner at the regional level - 3 points;
• team of an educational organization - winner of the regional level - 1 point.
• team of an educational organization - winner of the interdistrict council level - 0.5 points;
• team of an educational organization - winner of the interdistrict council level - 0.2 point.

Rating score =
((Unified State Exam score*K ud + Senior Olympiad score)*K st +
(OGE score + Olympiad score of the main level + Grade 7 diagnostics score) * To main +
(Grade 4 diagnostic score)*Beginning +
(Score for preschoolers)*To preschool +
(Score for the development of professional skills and professional excellence)* K spo +

Crime prevention score +
Point for amateur sports)

* Coefficient for socio-cultural work

Each student is counted only once according to the Unified State Examination parameter.

In 2017, the range of Olympiads within the framework of the Moscow Olympiad for Schoolchildren is expanding.

Each student in each subject is counted once in accordance with the maximum result. One student is counted in no more than two subjects. If a student transfers to another educational institution, the scores for the results of the current academic year's Olympiads during this academic year are divided in half between the educational organization that the student attended in this academic year and the educational organization that the student attended as of May 25 of the previous year.

Each student is counted in no more than one subject . Students who became winners or prize-winners at regional or final stages, are not taken into account in the municipal stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren.

In the Olympiad “Museums. Parks. Estates" in each parallel of students only one diploma with the maximum result is taken into account. Thus, the result “winner” means that the educational organization has at least one winner’s diploma in a parallel (regardless of their number in one parallel), the result “winner” means that the educational organization has at least one winner’s diploma in a parallel (regardless of their number in one parallel).

The results of students with disabilities at the Abilympics Championship are multiplied by a factor of 3 or 5 depending on the funding coefficient.

Today, society is in dire need of reliable and transparent information about the quality of services in educational organizations: schools, kindergartens, additional education institutions, colleges, universities. Issues of assessing the quality of education are of concern to all participants in the educational process, because this is a guarantee of an optimally high standard of living for the population and the basis for increasing the competitiveness of the country as a whole. The procedure for independent assessment of the quality of education is carried out in relation to the activities of educational organizations and the educational programs they implement in order to verify the compliance of the quality of the services provided with the needs of society. Ratings are a popular tool for informing consumers of educational services about the results of an independent assessment of the quality of education.

Rating (English rating - assessment, order, classification) - a numerical or ordinal indicator that reflects the importance or significance of a certain object or phenomenon. The list of objects or phenomena with the highest rating is usually called “Top N” or “TOP N”, where N is the number of objects in the list, usually a multiple of 10 Wikipedia https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rating.

Rating - ranking, prioritization, evaluation, order, classification. Rating means the determination of any evaluation parameter or group of parameters according to a specific evaluation algorithm, according to a given ranking scale, by polling a large target group, or a limited group of experts. In essence, a rating is a measure of the popularity of something Dictionary http://www.marketch.ru/marketing_dictionary/marketing_terms_r/rating/.

IN AND. Slobodchikov understands rating as a subjective assessment of a phenomenon on a given scale. With the help of the rating, various rating scales are constructed, for example, assessment of various aspects of work activity, the popularity of individuals, the prestige of professions, etc. Slobodchikov V.I. Isaev E.I. Fundamentals of psychological anthropology. Psychology of Human Development, 2000, 7 pp.

The rating of educational organizations is a form of presenting the results of assessing the activities of educational organizations or systems, in which the rating participants are placed in a certain sequence depending on the ratings received for various indicators of their activities.

Firstly, families are guided by the rating when choosing schools and kindergartens. Such a rating should include only those educational organizations that are accessible to real consumers, primarily on a territorial basis. Thus, the popular ratings do not fully respond to the parent community’s requests for the quality of secondary general education.

Thirdly, for heads of educational organizations, the rating is a source of information for making management decisions; it is a powerful incentive for development and setting new guidelines.

When rating educational organizations, it is important to remember the conditions that ensure the effectiveness of the system of independent assessment of the quality of education: subjects of assessment (the public, the media, experts, education authorities, regional quality assessment centers, etc.) and data sources (“closed” and public databases ). Not all information can be used when conducting an independent assessment of the quality of education and rating educational organizations. They must meet standard data requirements: relevance, reliability, completeness. It is also important that the data is presented in a single format, in common sources of information for all participants in the rating.

However, in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the operating conditions of educational organizations are heterogeneous, thereby creating a need to create variable models for constructing ratings.

In the Novgorod region, ratings are a key element of the motivational strategy for managing results and have been formed since 1990. To construct ratings, specific significant indicators are used that are recognized by the educational community and the population. The results of the ratings enable employees of the education system to get an accurate idea of ​​the success of their solutions to educational policy problems, and bonuses for high performance results. Through ratings, the best specialists in the implementation of educational policy are determined to maintain competition and disseminate successful experience into mass practice. Criteria and indicators have been developed to evaluate the performance of specialists from educational authorities.

For several years, all evaluation indicators reflected the criteria of “accessibility,” “quality,” and “efficiency” of education. The results included in the criterial base were divided into “general education”, “profile”, “creative” and “social-personal”. When determining the weight coefficient of each indicator, the significance of the result, the complexity of its achievement, and dependence on work efficiency, and not on external factors, were taken into account. Along with well-known ones, assessment procedures developed in the Novgorod region were used: testing of 4th grade students, sociological monitoring of the quality of educational activities. In addition, the conditions ensuring the accessibility of quality education were assessed: the availability of the required number of textbooks, qualified teaching staff, equipment, as well as conditions affecting the health of students.

Subsequently, indicators for assessing the quality of education were improved. At the moment, the assessment of indicator values ​​is carried out separately by the level of efficiency (the level of performance effectiveness, the level of efficiency of spending budget funds, the level of public assessment of the results of the activities of educational authorities and educational institutions) and by the dynamics of efficiency (the dynamics are defined as the difference in the values ​​of the corresponding indicator in the reporting and base year).

Data analysis is carried out by an expert group consisting of representatives of educational authorities, public organizations and independent experts. In accordance with the assessment of the values ​​of performance indicators (taking into account the results of expert analysis), the rating of the municipal district (urban district) or educational institution by level of efficiency, the rating by efficiency dynamics and the final rating are then determined.

In the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, a cluster approach is used, which levels out the specific features of educational organizations operating in different conditions (territorial differentiation, differences in the contingent, etc.). Taking into account the characteristics, 8 clusters were identified: innovative educational institutions, large and small urban schools based on the number of students in graduating classes, rural schools, basic schools, boarding schools, primary schools, and evening schools. The criteria were formed based on an analysis of consumer requests for the quality of educational services and are distributed in 9 areas: quality of education, content and technology of education, accessibility and quality of additional education, safety and comfort of the educational environment, equipment of the educational process, school operating hours, quality of staffing, openness educational organization, educational opportunities for children with special needs. The criteria for assessing the quality of education contain invariant and variable parts to take into account the differences in the differentiation of the cluster approach. Thereby providing each cluster with its own set of criteria, indicators and indicators.

Next, based on normalized data and weighting coefficients, a composite index of each educational organization is calculated. Based on its results, a rating of educational organizations is formed for each cluster separately.

In the Krasnoyarsk Territory, the selection of criteria for assessing the quality of education was carried out based on the results of a population survey and on the basis of statistical data held by education authorities. Thus, ratings for schools are based on the following areas and criteria: quality of education (average results of the Unified State Exam, GIA-9, Regional tests in Russian language and mathematics, results of participation in the stages of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren); equipment of the educational process (availability of specialized premises, use of the Internet); safety and comfort (providing medical care, food, security); quality of personnel (supply of personnel, level of qualifications); teaching children with special needs.

Ratings for preschool educational organizations are based on the following areas: availability of educational services (except for paid ones); quality of staffing; quality of conditions (according to the criteria of organizing space and conditions for maintaining health).

In the Astrakhan region, ratings are carried out in four areas, containing the following groups of indicators: indicators for assessing the quality of the conditions for the implementation of general education programs in the institution; indicators for assessing the results of mastering basic general education programs, characterizing the minimum level of achievement by students of the region of the current federal state educational standards and regional standards; indicators for assessing the achievement of educational qualifications based on the results of mastering basic general education programs as the main values ​​characterizing the quality of general education programs implemented in the region; indicators for assessing public opinion on the quality of educational services in educational institutions. A comprehensive assessment of the quality of education is carried out on the basis of: the results of a survey of parents of students of educational organizations in the Astrakhan region; standardized procedures for monitoring the quality of general education; data from federal state statistical observation on education; data on licensing procedures and state accreditation of educational institutions; final certification of graduates of 9th and 11th grades.

Thus, we can conclude that approaches to the formation of ratings of educational organizations are different in each specific region of the Russian Federation due to the peculiarities of their functioning and territorial location.

The rating serves as the basis for identifying and analyzing problems that slow down the pace of implementation of educational policy, for setting priorities when setting new tasks and optimizing mechanisms for solving them. Ratings create a competitive environment, which in turn accelerates the solution of priority tasks, identifies the best practices in solving problems for the purpose of further dissemination, increases public awareness of the results of ongoing reforms, inspiring public confidence.

The results of an independent assessment of the quality of education and ratings can be used in forecasting and comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various organizational models and educational systems, innovative design, in the development of management methods and public-private partnerships, intra- and inter-sectoral work, as well as combining the efforts of governing bodies, parents public and expert community in the development of education.