To adjust design documentation. Introducing changes to project documentation that has passed the examination

Making changes to the past examination project documentation , may be required due to various reasons. At the same time, in some cases, repeated expert work on the project is mandatory. All questions and nuances of making changes to project documentation and conducting a secondary examination will be considered in this article.

Changes to design documentation and re-examination

Making adjustments to project documentation after receiving a positive summary from experts is a situation that occurs quite often. So, paragraph 7 of Art. 52 of the Town Planning Code directly requires that appropriate corrections be made to the project if, during the development process, inconsistencies in the parameters from the theoretical data of the design documentation are discovered. Otherwise, discrepancies in the design data and the parameters of the actually constructed facility will not allow the subsequent execution of documents for the building.

In accordance with paragraph 15 of Art. 48 of the same code, after making adjustments to the project documentation before its approval, the developer or customer must send the project for examination. However, clause 3 of Art. 49 contains some exceptions and states that expert work on project documents is not required if:

• the revised design documentation has already been examined and received a positive resolution based on the results;
• the amendments made to the project did not affect the structural and other characteristics of the reliability and safety of the facility;
• adjustments to the project did not lead to an increase in construction costs.

The same thing, only from a different angle, is said in paragraph 44 of Government Decree No. 145 dated 03/05/2007. This provision of the Decree requires that modified design documentation that has received a positive approval be sent for expert analysis a second time expert opinion earlier, if the amendments affected technical solutions affecting the structural reliability and safety of the capital construction facility.

At the same time, in paragraph 44 of Resolution No. 145, the customer or developer has the choice of undergoing a re-examination of the revised project if the essence of the modification allows it not to undergo a re-examination. That is, in this case, the customer or developer can at will undergo the examination of project documentation again.

When is a re-examination of design documentation required?

An expert analysis of project documentation is initially carried out in order to obtain permission to construct the facility and begin actual construction with the fulfillment of all legislative and bureaucratic requirements.

But there are situations when, after passing an expert study, a second examination is required.

Don't know your rights?

1. First of all, this situation arises in the event of receiving a negative conclusion on the project. The goal with this option for repeated expert analysis project is obvious - obtaining a positive resolution for obtaining a construction permit. Therefore, customers are interested in making all the necessary amendments to the design documentation as quickly as possible, which are indispensable for the approving conclusion of experts.
2. The need for re-examination due to changes in design documentation in the form of:
   • development of additional sections;
   • adjustments or significant additions;
   • significant changes in the project.

Thus, it is clear that in any case, the need to conduct another examination of the design documentation arises due to changes to it. Only in the first option are these changes forced, due to previous errors or inaccuracies that resulted in a negative expert opinion. In the second case, the amendments are voluntary, due to some external circumstances or adjustments to the project associated with the objective application of theoretical data in the practical construction of a specific facility.

List of changes affecting the safety of the capital construction facility

So, the most important question that needs to be resolved by a developer or customer who makes adjustments to design documentation that has passed a positive examination: do the changes made concern technical solutions that affect the structural reliability and safety of the facility? That is, in fact, to conclude that it is necessary to conduct another expert analysis of the project documentation.

Order of the Ministry of Regional Development of Russia No. 624 dated December 30, 2009 approved the List of types of work affecting the safety of capital construction projects. The document is quite detailed and therefore voluminous. Types of work are divided into 3 sections:

• on engineering surveys;
• on preparation of project documentation;
• for construction, reconstruction and overhaul.

In addition, a significant part of the types of work within their section are divided into subtypes. So, for example, preparatory work for construction, reconstruction and overhaul (clause 2, section 3 of the List) include 4 subtypes:

• dismantling/dismantling of buildings, walls, ceilings, stairs, etc.;
• construction of temporary roads, sites, utility networks and structures;
• installation of rail crane tracks and foundations of stationary cranes;
• installation and dismantling of inventory external and internal scaffolding, technological waste chutes.

Such a detailed listing allows us to avoid any doubts about the involvement of the amendments made to the project in the adjustment of work that affects the safety of the capital construction facility, and therefore in the need for another examination of the project.

Procedure for re-examination

In accordance with paragraph 44 of Resolution No. 145, re-examination can be carried out an unlimited number of times (2 or more). At the same time, each subsequent examination is carried out in the order prescribed by law for conducting the initial state examination. Meanwhile, experts will evaluate:

• that part of the project documents to which amendments were made;
• compatibility of the modified part of the project with the rest of the design documentation, which was previously subject to expert analysis.

Thus, to conduct a re-examination, the customer must provide a package of documents according to the list specified in clause 13 of the Regulations approved by Resolution No. 145, including:

1. Application for examination.
2. Project documentation that has previously received a positive expert opinion.
3. A copy of the positive conclusion.
4. The task of making adjustments to the design documentation.
5. Certificate of amendments made to the draft.

It must be borne in mind that the entire project can be considered for re-examination if, since the initial or previous re-examination, amendments have been made to the legislation affecting the results of the state examination.

Making changes in the event of a negative examination of project documentation

If the project documentation received a negative conclusion based on the results of the experts’ work, then in paragraph 10 of Art. 49 of the Town Planning Code offers 2 solutions:

1. Contact the Ministry of Regional Development or the court and try to challenge the results of the expert opinion.
2. Pass a re-examination after eliminating all the specified shortcomings.

In practice, since experts rarely make mistakes, and trial- it’s not a cheap and time-consuming matter; it’s easier and more effective to amend the draft based on comments and go through the examination again. Moreover, the Regulations on the conduct of the examination, approved by Resolution No. 145, contain a rule allowing not to return to the applicant documents submitted for examination in paper form, if the comments that caused the negative conclusion are eliminated, possibly without returning the documentation. In this case, the applicant is given certain period, upon completion of which he must provide the expert organization with that part of the design documentation that has undergone changes and a certificate describing the amendments made.

Thus, revised design documentation requires a re-examination, as in mandatory, and at the request of the developer. At the same time, it is very important not to miss the moment, to correctly evaluate the changes made to the design documents and carry out a re-examination if required by law, otherwise later there may be great difficulties with documentation built object.

Recently, more and more developers are faced with the need to make adjustments to project documentation. The situation is complicated by the fact that the papers have already been issued to the customer, approved and accepted for work. How to act in such a situation? What are the specifics of making changes? What “pitfalls” are possible in the process of implementing the task? Let's consider these nuances in more detail.

According to the law, the procedure for canceling, replacing or making adjustments to project documentation is regulated by DSTU B A.2.4-4:2009. The customer acts as the initiator of such procedures. It is he who makes a preliminary decision on the need for adjustments due to the emergence of other design options or in the event of changes in the legislative sector. At the same time, the introduction and execution of such work is the task of the designer. After all procedures are completed, appropriate adjustments are made to the register.

The situation related to changes in technical regulations deserves special attention. In this case, the design documentation cannot be adjusted. In addition, making changes is not necessary in the following cases:

• With reduced execution costs construction work provided that the technical and economic parameters of the structure remain unchanged.
• In the event of adjustments being made to the conditions of construction of the facility that do not affect the increase in the overall time frame for completing construction work and the final estimate. At the same time, there remains a requirement related to maintaining the safety of the facility at all levels - fire and environmental.
• When the customer or developer replaces materials due to the corresponding bidding results. Here, changes are not necessary if the mentioned adjustments do not affect the safety of the facility, as well as the conditions of workers from the point of view of labor protection.
• In the case of acceptance of the structure for operation, provided that the procedure for constructing the facility was fully observed.

"Pitfalls" of making changes to the project

Despite the transparency of legislative norms in the field of preparation and approval of project documentation, questions regarding changes still remain. The main reason is imperfection in another sector (sanitary legislation). In this regard, the developer is not always able to obtain papers confirming the compliance of the rebuilt or reconstructed structure with the requirements of technical documentation and technical regulations.

The Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part 7, Article 52) stipulates that the parameters of a structure can be adjusted only on the basis of changes made to the design documentation. Wherein ready documents must be approved by the customer or developer responsible for the work. In addition, the amendments made should not contradict current legislative norms, technical regulations and documents existing in the field of standardization.

But cases are different. For example, adjustments made to the design documentation often do not violate the requirements, but lead to problems in the process of putting the structure into operation. Such cases Lately are arising more and more often and causing problems for customers and developers.

As an example, it is worth considering the option of building a boiler room. According to the law, the area of ​​the sanitary protection zone for such structures is not established. Moreover, installation of such structures is carried out only if there are appropriate justifications. In particular, the level of air pollution and the overall impact on the atmosphere can be calculated. As a result, a decision is made on the relevance of such work.

Let’s say the developer received a positive expert decision regarding the design documentation and permission to construct an object, for example, a large shopping facility. Later he decides to change finished project and bring into it a boiler room that was not provided for initial stage. In this case, the developer sets the goal of reducing the level of costs for operating the structure, increasing income and reducing the cost of paying for electricity.

The first stage in this case is a visit from the inspection body. During the inspection process, the construction inspector finds out that there are residential buildings around the newly built facility. Despite the fact that the boiler house does not have its own sanitary zone, the overall sanitary protection zone for the facility under construction is reduced. From this moment on, problems begin for the developer, who is forced to go through the authorities and look for specialists who are ready to perform calculations regarding air pollution.

On the one hand, the legal requirements have been met, but on the other hand, there are no guarantees that the newly constructed structure will not have a negative impact on environment. In such a situation, it is impossible to do without carrying out additional calculations and submitting them to the relevant authorities.

It would seem that it would be enough to take everything into account at the design stage, and the mentioned problems with permission and changes could be avoided. But the world is so dynamic that it is often impossible to keep up with new requirements and innovations. Every day something new appears in the sector of demand, legal requirements, preferences potential clients and so on. In this regard, it is necessary to make adjustments after passing the examination of project documentation and obtaining permits.

The example considered is only one of the options. In practice, there are many such situations and solving each of them requires an individual approach. This is why it is important to take action quickly and take into account legal requirements when making decisions about changes. Ideally, it is advisable to make changes when designing a project. The downside is that in reality this is not always possible.

How to make changes to a project: algorithm of actions

The procedure for making adjustments to the design documentation is as follows:

1. Obtaining permission to make changes. This work is undertaken by the service that plans the edits, and approval is handled by the planning group. Here you will need to fill out a form indicating the number, the sheet where the adjustments are made, their contents and notes (if necessary). After filling out the form, all that remains is to obtain the permit number (it is set by the archive employee, where the documents are stored).

There are some nuances when filling out this part. So, in the change column the serial number of the adjustment is written. In the “Sheet” column – sheets in which changes are made. The code is indicated separately (one of four options):

• “1” – improvement of documents.
• “2” – adjustment of norms and standards.
• “3” – changes due to additional requirements from the customer.
• “4” – eliminating errors.

In the first three cases, when filling out the “Contents” sector, you must indicate what the changes are related to (for example, based on a letter from the customer). In the latter case, write Additional information not necessary.

Special attention should be paid to the “Notes” column. Here, as a rule, the need to adjust the estimate may be indicated.

2. Corrections are made to the documents.

3. On old drawings, the main stamp is crossed out and another one is installed - canceling.

4. A note is written on new documents confirming the cancellation of the old sheet.

Thus, making changes to documentation is a procedure that requires a certain approach and knowledge of the law. If such a need arises, it is recommended to carry out the work immediately and taking into account current rules. Otherwise, problems may arise at the stage of passing the examination and putting the object into operation.

In accordance with the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation (Article 48, clause 12.1.), the preparation of project documentation at the initiative of the developer or technical customer can be carried out in relation to individual stages of construction and reconstruction of capital construction projects.

The construction stage means the construction of one of the capital construction projects, the construction of which is planned to be carried out on one plot of land, if such an object can be put into operation and operated autonomously, that is, regardless of the construction of other capital construction projects on this land plot, as well as the construction of part of a capital construction project that can be put into operation and operated autonomously, that is, regardless of construction other parts of this capital construction project.

Design and working documentation

The question naturally arises: if all these actions constitute design stage, then why was it divided into two parts. The answer may be that in this way the legislator wanted to speed up the starting phase of the investment cycle. To obtain permission to carry out construction work, high-quality design documentation is sufficient, which can be expertly studied without going into unnecessary details. After the state examination has been carried out and all comments have been corrected, working issues can be worked out.

• explanatory note;
• layout of the allocated plot of land;
• architectural solutions;
• space-planning and structural solutions;
• data on utility networks (water and electricity supply, drainage, air conditioning and ventilation, heating and heating networks, gas supply, communications);
• organization of construction (project);
• dismantling of capital facilities (project);
• environmental protection measures;
• fire safety measures;
• accessibility for disabled people;
• energy efficiency and availability of energy metering devices;
• estimate materials;
• other required materials.

JavaScript is disabled

Therefore, before sending it for examination, a set of adjusted design documentation must be checked for compliance with the previously adjusted and developed sections (including by the original designer) with the current ones regulatory requirements with documentary confirmation of this compliance - additional registration of all volumes of documentation title pages with signatures of persons responsible for the project.

After the first adjustment carried out by us, a positive conclusion from the State Examination Committee was also issued. Unchanged volumes were presented for examination as they were issued by the previous design organization and sections corrected by us, indicating the changes made already with our title sheets and replaced by our designers.

How does the final version of the Boguchanskaya HPP project differ from the original one?

In the area where the rockfill dam adjoins the right bank of the Angara there will be an additional fish-inhabited reef complex, which will provide fish with favorable conditions for feeding, wintering and spawning, as well as the opportunity to independently go to the upper reaches of the reservoir.

Each of these innovations has a serious justification and significantly improves the characteristics of hydroelectric power plants. For example, the second spillway has greatly increased the reliability of the station, which is no longer afraid of abnormal floods. Without a backup spillway, technical problems could theoretically arise during the operation of the hydroelectric power station. Now, when floods and floods pass, two spillways can come into operation.

Land surveying project and territory planning project: characteristic properties and differences

The outcome of the hearing will decide the issue. It can be both positive and negative, which is due to the objective nature of the situation in the land zone planned for design. Here it is important to consider a number of factors that can influence seismic processes and the overall background of the landscape.

In cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg, there are already quite a lot of such violations. For these cities there are maximum high requirements to the development of land surveying and planning projects, in order to not only comply with the required regulations, but also correct existing shortcomings.

Tips for equity holders: what to do when the area of ​​the apartment differs from the design one

Therefore, the possibility of changing the refill price either up or down depends solely on the terms of your contract. Carefully re-read your share participation agreement (and if you bought an apartment by assigning the rights of claim, also look at the assignment agreement). Typically, all issues related to price recalculation are written down in the “Contract Price” section. If nothing is written there at all about the possibility of adjusting the price, this means that neither you nor the developer can demand additional payment in connection with a change in area.

With this option, the price of replenishment will change only if the actual area deviates from the design one up or down by more than 1 square meter. That is, if the deviation of the area does not exceed 1 sq.m., the payment under such an agreement will not be recalculated.

What is the fundamental difference between a project (stage P) and working documentation (stage RD) because both have an explanatory note, diagrams, plans, specifications

The “Project” stage represents the main approved design stage reconstruction and construction projects, on the basis of which construction permits are obtained and an updated estimate for the work is calculated. The “Project” stage, in fact, is the embodiment of the general technical specifications.

In accordance with Government Decree Russian Federation dated February 16, 2008 No. 87 “On the composition of sections of design documentation and requirements for their content” design documentation for capital construction projects for industrial and non-industrial purposes consists of 13 sections:

Reconstruction and major repairs - what's the difference?

Consequently, the main difference between major repairs and reconstruction is interpreted by the Town Planning Code as carrying out work that concerns load-bearing structures or not. If, for example, repairs and reconstruction are carried out wooden houses, then in the first case it is possible to replace, for example, windows, doors, heating systems, hot water supply or hot water supply, etc. And during reconstruction, floors can be completed, rooms can be added, remodeling and other work affecting the load-bearing elements and structures of the object can be carried out.

By reconstruction of property we mean the transformation of a global purpose with a change in various parameters. For example, the number of floors of a building or its height, as well as its area, can be changed, including extensions, reconstruction, extensions, and expansion of volumes. Linear objects are also an exception.

Difference between Photoshop and Illustrator

Photoshop, as we noted above, is intended primarily for editing raster images. That is, those pictures that are built from pixels and have a fixed resolution. Editing a picture is carried out by Photoshop, like any other “raster” program, through low-level adjustments to the colors of the image.

Thus, Photoshop involves working with a project placed on only one canvas - a window in which certain graphic elements are located. Illustrator allows you to distribute edited images across several vector platforms for graphics processing.

Home page

The purpose of work schedules, on the one hand, is to detail the site schedule and, on the other, to provide a timely response to all sorts of changes in the situation at a construction site. Work schedules are the most common type scheduling. As a rule, they are compiled very quickly and often have a simplified form, i.e., as practice shows, they are not always properly optimized. Nevertheless, they usually take into account the actual situation at a construction site better than others, since they are compiled by persons directly involved in this construction. This especially applies to taking into account weather conditions, the peculiarities of interaction between subcontractors, and the implementation of various rationalization proposals, i.e. factors that are difficult to account for in advance.

Consolidated calendar plan (schedule) in the PIC determines the order of construction of objects, i.e. the start and end dates of each project, the duration of the preparatory period and the entire construction as a whole. For the preparatory period, as a rule, a separate calendar schedule. Existing standards (SNiP 12-01-2004 to replace SNiP 3.01.01-85) provide for drawing up in PIC calendar plans in monetary form, i.e. in thousand rubles with distribution by quarters or years (for the preparatory period - by month).

Making changes to the existing project in accordance with new requirements for the facility or changed construction conditions

(Bulgarian language; Български) - promyana [updating] for the project

(Czech language; Čeština) - změna project

(German; Deutsch) - Projektänderung

(Hungarian; Magyar) - tervmódositás

(Mongolian) - zurag tosliin zohitsuulalt

(Polish language; Polska) - korekta project

(Romanian language; Român) - corectare a proiectului

(Serbo-Croatian language; Srpski jezik; Hrvatski jezik) - ispravke i dopune projekta

(Spanish; Español) - enmienda del proyecto

(English language; English) - correction of design

(French; Français) - correction du projet

Source: Terminological dictionary on construction in 12 languages

• - A regulatory process when decision makers set as their goal to eliminate in any period only part of the discrepancy between the actual and intended levels of the variables they control...

  Economic dictionary

• - A procedure for revaluing positions carried out every trading day, as a result of which the current price of each position is equated to the calculated price of that trading day by calculating a variation margin...

  Dictionary of depository terms

• - from lat. correctio - amendment, partial change, correction, correction...

  Dictionary of business terms

• - clarification of margin accounts reflecting profits and losses. Produced daily...

  Dictionary of business terms

• - a slight reverse price movement following a long period of price dynamics in one direction. In English: Market correctionSee. See also: Stock quotes  ...

  Financial Dictionary

• - making adjustments to something, amendment...

  Big economic dictionary

• - making changes to current legislature tax law...

  Large economic dictionary

• - making changes to the developed and approved by the relevant authority...

  Large economic dictionary

• - indexation of the depreciation value of long-term fixed assets, determined on the basis of their original cost...

  Large economic dictionary

• - operates periodically, when the translator is unsure of the correctness of the translation solutions being developed. It may include the level of content of utterances, as well as syntactic and lexical levels...

  Explanatory translation dictionary

• - ; pl. corrections, R....

  Spelling dictionary of the Russian language

• - CORRECT, -ru, -ruish; -anny; ness...

  Ozhegov's Explanatory Dictionary

• - correction g. 1. process of action according to ch. adjust 2. The result of such an action; adjustment 2....

  Explanatory Dictionary by Efremova

• - proofreader...

  Russian spelling dictionary

• - ...

  Word forms

• - noun, number of synonyms: 9 correction correction correction watered correction adaptation device regulation retouching...

  Synonym dictionary

"PRJECT ADJUSTMENT" in books

Adjustment of the General Schematic